The secondary, of course, seems to be fainter than the WDS reported magnitude. WDS data: 6.42 - 7.32mv, G3V, 349° pa, 1.5", 2010.Ī very difficult pair, due to the faintness of both the primary and secondary.
WDS data: 9.57 - 10.23mv, B1III, 160.60° pa, 3.010", 2009.Ī close, but obvious pair, each in the other's first diffraction ring. Seen in the 9 and 6, but best in the 2.8mm. Struve 3061 is in the same field, and the 2 pairs have similar position angles. Struve 3060 is in the same field, and the 2 pairs have similar position angles. WDS data: 9.84 - 9.86mv, F2, 123° pa, 2.1", 2012.Ī nice white pairs of stars, position angle approximately 150 degrees. Aladin/UCAC4: The non WDS pair have discordant proper motions. The faint secondary is seen at all powers, but seems best in the 15mm. The faint secondary appears fainter than its WDS magnitude owing to its proximity to the primary. The very slight elongation was about 40° from the WDS measure. The widely spaced secondary is 0.6mv fainter than the WDS brightness. WDS data: 5.96 - 7.17mv, G9IIIA1V, 71° pa, 15.1", 2010.Ī nice pair, part of a lovely star field of 3 very wide pairs, all in a row. Pastel orange and blue, like Albireo, but a bit fainter.
Surprising no one ever noticed it before. P: Pinnacles overlook,ī: Little Tycho Observatory, LBRP: Little Bennett Regional ParkĪn unequal, lackluster pair in a rather nice field. Separations are much less accurate) with the Washington double star catalog.įield L denotes the location. Separation noted, my observation of the pair agreed (within ~ 5° position angle,
Note that for observations made after 2009, If there is no position angle and Observations of Double Stars Observations of Double Stars listed by increasing right ascension.
0 kommentar(er)
